The Perceived Influence of AI on the Craftsmanship of Physicians: Qualitative Interview and Focus Group Study
Deployment research focused on how AI changes clinical roles and how its outcomes should be measured.
TL;DR
- A qualitative study examined how physicians perceive AI's influence on the craftsmanship of their work.
- Other new papers reported external validation of a hybrid rule-based and machine-learning decision support system for prescription review, and proposed accountable action end points for evaluating AI in digital public health.
- A ClinicalTrials.gov record from Hopital Montfort covers the use of AI to create accessible and reliable patient education materials.
A qualitative interview and focus-group study examined the perceived influence of AI on the craftsmanship of physicians. [1]
A development and external validation study described a hybrid rule-based and machine-learning clinical decision support system to support prescription review. [2]
A separate paper set out practical pathways for using artificial intelligence to improve efficiency in nephrology practice, and another proposed accountable action end points for evaluating AI in digital public health. [3] [4]
On the trial side, a ClinicalTrials.gov record sponsored by Hopital Montfort covers AI to create accessible and reliable patient education materials. [5]
Why it matters
Research is shifting from whether models work to how they change clinical roles and how outcomes are measured, the evidence base payers and health systems will use to decide which AI tools to buy.
Editor's note
Cited at the metadata and registry level; study results were not summarised or reproduced. This is not medical advice.